tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7670425954609557512.post563405706872729173..comments2023-09-02T07:59:55.010-07:00Comments on The Bottom Line: Why Richard Dawkins Won't Debate William Lane CraigCameron Buettelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13217501740084187739noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7670425954609557512.post-81669066487868920192013-02-10T11:09:06.165-08:002013-02-10T11:09:06.165-08:00Isn't that awesome!...none of these men have t...Isn't that awesome!...none of these men have the ultimate answers. Genesis 1:1, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.". No man has ever been able to refute this truth for the simple truth that no man was present "In the beginning". If the response is, "we conclude by the evidence" may I offer a bit of information, the evidence you use to conclude belongs to the One who created all things "In the beginning"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7670425954609557512.post-67581334503860467412011-05-18T19:35:01.880-07:002011-05-18T19:35:01.880-07:00I guess Dawkins wants to take the same approach in...I guess Dawkins wants to take the same approach in debating Dr. William Lane Craig the way Norman Geisler refuses to debate Dr. James R. White. Dawkins' and Geisler's positions would be resoundingly defeated in a public debate with these gentlemen. If these Dawkins and Geisler are unable to honestly defend their positions then, by all means, exit stage left.Michael Lawmasterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03919034430085510082noreply@blogger.com